![]() The 32, 34, 36, and 39 buses stop at First Street and Independence Avenue, a two block walk from the Building.Īdditional information on riding the Metro is available at the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.Īmtrak, VRE, and MARC trains service Union Station, which is located approximately 0.5 miles from the Court. ![]() The Circulator (Navy Yard Line), 96, 97, and A11 buses all stop in front of the Supreme Court Building. View area map.Ĭapitol South (Orange, Blue and Silver Lines, 0.3 miles) "It's a story of someone who's always been very hard working, who has not had things handed to her, who has worked for all the things that she's achieved," Barkow said.The Supreme Court of the United States is located on First Street NE between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue, adjacent to the U.S. Her husband, Patrick Jackson, is a surgeon in the Washington, D.C., area, where together they have raised two daughters. Two uncles have been law enforcement officers. Her younger brother – her only sibling – served in the military and did tours in combat. Her mother was a public high school principal in the county, while her father was a teacher and later county school board attorney. Jackson attended Miami-Dade public schools. "Her Miami roots will afford her valuable perspective on the rights and lives of the people who come before the court," members of the Cuban American Bar Association wrote in a letter to the president this month. The White House is expected to highlight Jackson's personal story as the embodiment of the American Dream. The president's allies on Capitol Hill and among Democratic grassroots groups have begun mobilizing to promote and defend the nominee, gearing up for a media blitz to mark both the historic nature of the nomination and counter expected Republican attacks, some of which have already been racially-charged. She could also face questions about her affiliation with Harvard University – both as an alumna and member Board of Overseers – ahead of a major lawsuit challenging the school's use of race-based Affirmative Action in admissions that will be heard by the Supreme Court later this year. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Sunday that his party will not engage in "personal slime attacks" but will scrutinize the candidate's record.ĭemocrats have the votes to confirm Jackson without Republican support, but President Biden has said he hopes to win over some members of the other party.ĭuring her appeals court confirmation hearing last year, Republicans questioned Jackson on issues of race ties to progressive legal groups her rulings against the Trump administration the impact of sentencing reductions and her work as a public defender for Guantanamo detainees. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said this week that the nominee will be "respectfully treated and thoroughly vetted." Sen. "I think she absolutely on the merits should be a person who appeals to people of all political stripes." "She is not someone who is a firebrand off on her own, creating and doing new things which I don't think she should be doing as a lower court judge," Barkow told ABC. Sentencing Commission, predicted Jackson could help "dial down the temperature" around the Court if confirmed. Rachel Barkow, an NYU law professor, former Harvard classmate of Jackson and former member of the U.S. "She really feels that people who come to the court or who interact with the judicial system, whether they are civil or criminal parties, that they feel heard and that the court is considering their arguments." "She believes the judiciary should be accessible and transparent," said Sanchi Khare, who clerked for Judge Jackson in 2019. Jackson's former colleagues and associates describe her approach as "Breyer-esque," qualities Biden has explicitly sought to replicate on the bench: moderate, pragmatic, and a consensus-builder. The decision recently affirmed by the U.S. Late last year, Judge Jackson joined a unanimous appeals court panel decision rejecting former President Donald Trump's attempt to shield his records from review by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. Jackson concluded the changes were "arbitrary and capricious" in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. Then-District Court Judge Jackson wrote a 118-page ruling ordering McGahn to testify, concluding that "presidents are not kings" and could not assert universal executive privilege over former aides.Įarlier this month, Judge Jackson published her first appeals court opinion – a unanimous decision in favor of a large union of federal government workers contesting new federal labor guidelines that would have made collective bargaining more difficult. One of her most high-profile decisions came in the 2019 case of former White House Counsel Don McGahn, who was contesting a congressional subpoena for testimony.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |